【Hardware.fr】返修率排名——2015年4月数据

显卡篇2014.11-2015.4
- Gainward 1,44% (contre 2,67%)耕升
- Zotac 1,57% (contre 3,09%)
- ASUS 2,08% (contre 3,00%)
- Gigabyte 2,37% (contre 2,98%)
- MSI 2,48% (contre 2,25%)
- Sapphire 2,71% (contre 4,04%)
括号内为去年数据
Exception faite de MSI, tous les taux sont en baisse ce qui est une bonne chose. Gainward en profite pour prendre la première place alors que Sapphire, bien que toujours dernier, se rapproche des autres fabricants. Pour changer, de trop nombreux modèles vendus à plus de 100 unités (et moins de 200 en italique) ont obtenus des taux de retour supérieur à 5%（本人四级水平翻译大概如下：除了微星，其他所有的水平都在下降，耕升超越蓝宝石夺得第一）

N卡
- 1,19% GeForce GTX 660
- 1,79% GeForce GTX 760
- 2,91% GeForce GTX 770
- 3,00% GeForce GTX 780
- 6,27% GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 0,12% GeForce GTX TITAN/BLACK
- 5,78% GeForce GTX 970
- 0,00% GeForce GTX 980
调查自2014.11开始960还没上市，但是980也有点。。。欧洲没人买吗

R9 270/270X
- 6,61% MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING 2G
- 6,60% MSI Radeon R9 270X HAWK
- 3,01% MSI Radeon R9 270 GAMING 2G
- 2,65% Sapphire Radeon R9 270X Dual-X 2G GDDR5 OC
- 1,67% Sapphire Radeon R9 270X Dual-X 4G GDDR5 OC
- 1,46% ASUS R9270X-DC2T-4GD5
R9 280/280X
- 10,08% Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Tri-X 3G GDDR5
- 7,61% ASUS R9280X-DC2T-3GD5
- 4,79% Sapphire Radeon R9 280 Dual-X 3G GDDR5 OC
- 3,92% Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Dual-X 3G GDDR5 OC
- 3,68% Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Vapor-X 3G GDDR5 OC
- 2,75% Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Toxic 3G GDDR5
R9 290/290X
- 10,45% Sapphire Radeon R9 290 Vapor-X 4G GDDR5 OC
- 8,45% MSI Radeon R9 290X GAMING 4G
- 7,10% MSI Radeon R9 290 GAMING 4G
- 6,80% Sapphire Radeon R9 290 Tri-X 4G GDDR5 OC
- 6,32% Sapphire Radeon R9 290X 4G 21226-00

GTX 660
- 1,70% Gigabyte GV-N660OC-2GD
- 1,10% MSI N660 GAMING 2GD5/OC
- 0,80% MSI N660 GAMING 2GD5
- 0,63% ZOTAC GeForce GTX 660 Synergy Edition 2GB
- 0,00% ASUS GTX660-DC2O-2GD5
- 0,00% ASUS GTX660-DC2OCPH-2GD5
GTX 760
- 2,60% MSI N760 TF 4GD5/OC
- 2,01% MSI N760 TF 2GD5/OC
- 1,41% Gigabyte GV-N760OC-4GD
- 1,12% MSI N760-2GD5/OC
- 1,09% ASUS GTX760-DC2OC-2GD5
- 0,29% Gigabyte GV-N760OC-2GD
GTX 770
- 2,89% Gainward GeForce GTX 770 Phantom 2 Go OC
- 2,61% MSI N770 TF 2GD5/OC
- 2,47% Gigabyte GV-N770OC-2GD
- 2,34% Gigabyte GTX770OC-4GD
- 2,15% MSI N770-2GD5/OC
- 1,85% ASUS GTX770-DC2OC-2GD5
- 1,82% Gainward GeForce GTX 770 2 Go
- 1,73% Gainward GeForce GTX 770 Phantom 4 Go
GTX 780/780 Ti
- 24,75% Gigabyte GV-N78TGHZ-3GD
- 5,53% Gigabyte GV-N78TOC-3GD PCI-E
- 5,24% ASUS GTX780TI-DC2OC-3GD5
- 4,09% ZOTAC GeForce GTX 780 OC 3GB
- 3,91% Gainward GeForce GTX 780 Phantom 3GB
- 3,13% MSI GTX 780TI GAMING 3G
- 2,94% Gigabyte GV-N780OC-3GD
- 2,88% MSI N780 TF 3GD5/OC
- 1,96% ASUS GTX780-DC2OC-3GD5
- 0,81% ASUS POSEIDON-GTX780-P-3GD5

24,75% Gigabyte GV-N78TGHZ-3GD
- 10,45% Sapphire Radeon R9 290 Vapor-X 4G GDDR5 OC
- 10,08% Sapphire Radeon R9 280X Tri-X 3G GDDR5
- 8,45% MSI Radeon R9 290X GAMING 4G
- 7,61% ASUS Radeon R9280X-DC2T-3GD5
- 7,10% MSI Radeon R9 290 GAMING 4G
- 6,80% Sapphire Radeon R9 290 Tri-X 4G GDDR5 OC
- 6,72% MSI GeForce GTX 970 GAMING 4G 4 Go
- 6,72% Sapphire Radeon R7 250 2G DDR3
- 6,61% MSI Radeon R9 270X GAMING 2G
- 6,60% MSI Radeon R9 270X HAWK
- 6,32% Sapphire Radeon R9 290X 4G 21226-00
- 5,53% Gigabyte GV-N78TOC-3GD
- 5,24% ASUS GTX780TI-DC2OC-3GD5
Gigabyte fait très fort avec sa GeForce GTX 780 Ti GHz et son gros overclocking d'usine qui n'est pas du tout validé correctement.
基佬们可能被大技嘉的780TI闪瞎了眼，下面一句是解释，本基佬翻译如下：技嘉的780TI有很强大的超频能力但是出厂检测并不严格

上面是显卡数据，下面看下主板返修率
- ASUS 2,43% (contre 2,86%)
- ASRock 2,61% (contre 2,99%)
- MSI 2,82% (contre 2,65%)
- Gigabyte 2,96% (contre 2,51%)
无亮点，毕竟高贵的阿苏斯

主流板子
- 3,30% Z87/Z97
- 2,54% H87/H97
- 2,17% B85
- 1,74% H81
- 3,26% 990
- 3,99% 970
- 2,35% A88X/A85X
- 3,19% A78/A75
- 1,79% A58/A55

超频板子
- 5,87% MSI Z97 GAMING 5
- 5,87% MSI Z97 GAMING 3
- 5,84% ASUS Z87-PLUS C2
- 5,36% MSI Z97 PC MATE
- 4,96% ASUS MAXIMUS VI FORMULA C2 Z87
- 4,50% MSI Z87-G41 PC MATE
- 4,31% ASUS Z87I-PRO C2
- 3,78% Gigabyte Z97-D3H
- 3,17% MSI Z97-G45 GAMING
- 3,15% ASUS Z87-PRO C2
- 3,02% ASUS Z87-K C2
- 2,99% ASUS MAXIMUS VII HERO Z97
- 2,85% MSI Z87-G45 GAMING
- 2,74% Gigabyte Z97X-GAMING 3
- 2,73% MSI Z87-G43
- 2,50% ASUS Z87-A C2
- 2,02% ASUS Z97-A
- 1,83% ASUS MAXIMUS VII RANGER Z97
- 1,41% ASUS Z97-K
- 0,94% ASUS GRYPHON Z87 C2
- 0,88% ASUS CM Z97I-PLUS
- 0,85% MSI Z97 GAMING 7
- 0,73% Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H

总体
- 7,94% ASRock FM2A75 Pro4+
- 6,90% ASRock 990FX Extreme3
- 5,87% MSI Z97 GAMING 5
- 5,87% MSI Z97 GAMING 3
- 5,84% ASUS Z87-PLUS C2
- 5,38% ASRock 980DE3/U3S3
- 5,36% MSI Z97 PC MATE
- 5,31% ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0
- 5,21% ASUS H87M-E C2

内存篇 括号内为去年数据
- Crucial 0,50% (contre 0,57%) 英睿达
- Kingston 0,65% (contre 0,36%)金士顿
- Corsair 0,81% (contre 1,20%)海盗船
- G.Skill 1,30% (contre 0,97%)芝奇
Crucial passe devant Kingston, alors que le classement était inchangé depuis 2 ans 1/2. G.Skill passe dernier.
英睿达超越金士顿，芝奇掉到最后

总体，内存无亮点
- 5,90% Kingston HyperX Fury HX316C10FBK2
- 3,88% Corsair XMS3 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9
- 2,03% Corsair Vengeance LP CML8GX3M2A1600C9
- 2,03% G.Skill RL F3-12800CL9D-8GBRL
- 1,83% G.Skill Aegis F3-1600C11S-8GIS
- 1,75% G.Skill NT F3-1600C11D-8GNT
- 1,23% Crucial Ballistix Sport BLS2C4G3D169DS3CEU
- 0,95% Kingston ValueRAM KVR16N11/8
- 0,94% Corsair Vengeance LP CML8GX3M2A1600C9B
- 0,92% G.Skill NT F3-1600C11S-8GNT
- 0,85% G.Skill NS F3-1600C11D-8GNS
- 0,76% G.Skill Aegis F3-1600C11D-8GIS
- 0,75% G.Skill X F3-12800CL9D-8GBXL
- 0,60% Crucial CT102464BA160B
- 0,53% G.Skill Ares F3-1600C9D-8GAB
- 0,49% Kingston HyperX Beast KHX16C9T3K2/8X
- 0,20% Kingston HyperX Black KHX16C9B1BK2/8
- 0,00% Corsair Dominator CMP4GX3M2A1600C9
- 0,00% Corsair Vengeance CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10
- 0,00% Corsair Vengeance LP CML8GX3M1A1600C10
- 0,00% Corsair Vengeance Pro CMY8GX3M2A1600C9R
- 0,00% Crucial CT2KIT51264BA160BJ
- 0,00% G.Skill XM F3-12800CL7D-8GBXM
- 0,00% Kingston HyperX Black KHX16C9B1BK2/8X
- 0,00% Kingston HyperX Fury HX316C10FK2/8
- 0,00% Kingston HyperX Genesis KHX1600C9D3K2/8GX
- 0,00% Kingston ValueRAM KVR16N11S8K2/8

SSD篇
- Intel 0,15% (contre 0,27%)
- Samsung 0,18% (contre 0,24%)
- Corsair 0,27% (contre 0,87%)
- Kingston 0,32% (contre 0,63%)
- Crucial 0,41% (contre 0,57%)
- Sandisk 0,48% (contre 0,29%)
毕竟因特尔大法好

低级别组
120-128 Go :
1,23% Samsung 850 Pro
0,75% Crucial M550
0,58% Crucial M500
0,38% Sandisk Ultra Plus
0,34% SanDisk SSD
0,30% Kingston HyperX 3K
0,22% Kingston SSDNow V300
0,16% Samsung 840 EVO
0,12% Crucial MX100
0,00% Corsair Force LS
0,00% Intel SSD 530
0,00% Samsung 840 Pro
0,00% SanDisk Extreme II
好歹是三丧